Re: [Sipping] draft-holmberg-sipping-199-02

[Dale.Worley at comcast.net]

   From: "Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)" <christer.holmberg at ericsson.com>

   Earlier I already gave examples of what type of "resources" could
   be released, and at that point you said you were "convinced" :)

Yes, you're right.  Here's a copy of that message:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.sipping/12325
and your explanation:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.sipping/12309

Given that many people have this same concern, could you copy those
examples into the I-D so it's clear what "resources" we're concerned
about?

But I do still think that you've got a product that you're trying to
get us to bless -- there's only one requirement listed in the I-D,
that 199 be generated by the proxy, and that is a point that there is
no consensus on.  There's no point in giving that as a *requirement*,
unless there is an existing proxy that does that.

Dale


_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip at ietf.org for new developments of core SIP