Re: [Sipping] FW: WGLC Review: draft-ietf-sipping-presence-scaling-requirements-01.txt

[Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo at ericsson.com>]

Hi,

as you may remember, a while ago, we (i.e., the chairs) asked whether or 
not we should be publishing this RFC. We got off-list and on-list 
feedback stating that this draft was important and that we should 
publish it. However, we did not get any volunteers in addition to Vijay 
to review this draft (its WGLC ends today).

We would like to get two additional reviewers for this draft before 
progressing it further. Note that this is a fairly short draft and that 
reviewing it should not take long.

In short, if you think this draft is important, the best way to state 
your opinion will be to volunteer to review it ;o)

Thanks,

Gonzalo


Mary Barnes wrote:
> Oops!  I didn't have the right title to get this automatically to the
> authors.  Please make sure to incldue the right address in posting any
> comments on this doc (folks will sometimes miss comments if they're only
> sent to the WG mailing list).
> 
> Thanks,
> Mary. 
> 
> ______________________________________________ 
> From: 	Barnes, Mary (RICH2:AR00)  
> Sent:	Wednesday, August 13, 2008 12:37 PM
> To:	sipping at ietf.org
> Cc:	'Gonzalo Camarillo';
> 'draft-ietf-sipping-presence-scaling at tools.ietf.org'; simple mailing
> list
> Subject:	WGLC  Review:
> draft-ietf-sipping-presence-scaling-requirements-01.txt
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> This is to announce a Working Group Last Call on the following document
> to be published as Informational:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-presence-scaling-
> requirements-01.txt
> 
> The review period will end on 3 Sept 2008 (3 weeks time). 
> 
> Note that I have cross-posted to the SIMPLE WG, but ask that you please
> send your comments only to the SIPPING WG mailing list and authors.
> 
> At this point we only have one reviewer that has volunteered:  Vijay
> Gurbani
> We need at least two others and a presence expert (per RAI review
> process). 
> 
> And, we do encourage others to review and make any final comments on the
> document at this time (including the very useful "Ready" comment). 
> 
> Thanks,
> Mary
> SIPPING WG co-chair
> 
> As a reminder, the SIPPING WG review guidelines are available at:
> https://softarmor.com/sipping/process/wg-review/sipping-review-guideline
> s.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
> This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
> Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sip at ietf.org for new developments of core SIP
> 

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip at ietf.org for new developments of core SIP