Re: [Sipping] I-D Action:draft-loreto-sipping-context-id-requirements-01.txt

[Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat at cisco.com>]

IMO this is a big improvement over the prior version.
It focuses much more on the features desired than the mechanism for 
realizing those features.

BUT it still contains an assumption that the solution will involve 
multiple dialogs between the originating and terminating parties, with a 
need for explicit correlation between the dialogs at both ends. IMO 
there are better solutions that don't require that.

If that assumption can be removed from this draft, so we can just agree 
on the desired user experience before getting into details of 
implementation, then I would wholeheartedly support this draft. I think 
these *are* the kinds of features that can make sip compelling.

When it is stripped back to that level, this might be better dealt with 
in the bliss wg.

	Thanks,
	Paul
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip at ietf.org for new developments of core SIP