Re: [Sipping] Decision needed on final issue withdraft-ietf-sipping-update-pai-07

["Elwell, John" <john.elwell at siemens.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:drage at alcatel-lucent.com] 
> Sent: 24 October 2008 12:22
> To: Elwell, John; sipping at ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Sipping] Decision needed on final issue 
> withdraft-ietf-sipping-update-pai-07
> 
> The problem with the current words is that this document updates RFC
> 3325, and therefore by implication any statement of scoping implies a
> rescoping of RFC 3325.
> 
> So you actually need to say that this document makes no change to any
> existing or implied usage of identify in responses as defined by RFC
> 3325 - 
[JRE] I like this suggestion.

> or alternatively just don't include any mention of responses at
> all.
> 
> But personally I think we should solve the response issue by 
> identifying
> conditions under which it can be valid - see other mail on 
> this subject.
[JRE] I would like to, but we have to convince everyone concerned that
we have a valid solution.

John

> 
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip at ietf.org for new developments of core SIP