[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sipping] New Internet Draft for Caller Identity Blocking

To: Nils Ohlmeier <lists at ohlmeier.org>
Subject: Re: [Sipping] New Internet Draft for Caller Identity Blocking
From: Victor Pascual Ávila <victor.pascual.avila at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 21:28:12 +0100
Cc: sipping at ietf.org
Delivered-to: sipping at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wx29ZHtvk5k4+k8IPUe4WRZ/i3R8KSN4qr0ioeGU9lQ=; b=b3d2+2tw+ODH29KggXRA2tSXLL0adM8ZFCvKBfW7ErKNuUu7V34OO+ie5AXsQzs51l 92qalWY9h+TTAusz9H35jabndrvafOdutSdrGr8fAD/hahtrYLD2DORwvIu9agrt4v8p 6xmhWP5Ft3HKzQzbhNfrQEIXoTUuLic/5rltg=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=w2i70bLlBIPB9jBL7SLAsf3XfaF4pBtNDP98RDTHJ9MiOCncuyLc8Ip/G/hdgXuJ/E pbz96EjhVRM9exQvGCBgkbshOxoUjkjLFHfM+NjLn5gbkcZ2BFeDXfM9SSiBVNkA4NXg ypym5dLVqQAnQhuzKpy3+BTPdrO71/BkfwCIQ=
In-reply-to: <e3892da4dc009df06c680e311b6e53db.squirrel at www.ohlmeier.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipping>
List-help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <750BBC72E178114F9DC4872EBFF29A5B05F6EC3F at ZMY16EXM66.ds.mot.com> <e3892da4dc009df06c680e311b6e53db.squirrel at www.ohlmeier.com>

Hi Nils,
thanks for your comments.

On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Nils Ohlmeier <lists at ohlmeier.org> wrote:
> you and your draft are talking about allowing the terminating UA to give
> some "feedback" for an incoming call. How is this related to CANCEL at
> all? Maybe I'm missing here something but a CANCEL is only send by the
> originator if the call was not yet established, right?!

IMHO it might make sense when dealing with B2BUAs (e.g. a 3pcc service).

Please, correct me if I'm wrong.

Cheers,
-- 
Victor Pascual Ávila

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Sipping] New Internet Draft for Caller Identity Blocking
  - From: Nils Ohlmeier

References:
- [Sipping] New Internet Draft for Caller Identity Blocking
  - From: Avasarala Ranjit-A20990
- Re: [Sipping] New Internet Draft for Caller Identity Blocking
  - From: Nils Ohlmeier

Prev by Date: [Sipping] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-johnston-sipping-batch-notify-00.txt
Next by Date: Re: [Sipping] New Internet Draft for Caller Identity Blocking
Previous by thread: Re: [Sipping] New Internet Draft for Caller Identity Blocking
Next by thread: Re: [Sipping] New Internet Draft for Caller Identity Blocking
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread