[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sipping] PRACK: Does non-200 response cease re-transmissionofreliable 18x?

To: "DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS" <mdolly at att.com>
Subject: Re: [Sipping] PRACK: Does non-200 response cease re-transmissionofreliable 18x?
From: "Dale Worley" <dworley at nortel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:53:56 -0400
Cc: sipping at ietf.org
Delivered-to: sipping at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <14C85D6CCBE92743AF33663BF5D24EBA02BD45FF at gaalpa1msgusr7e.ugd.att.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipping>
List-help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Nortel Networks
References: <14C85D6CCBE92743AF33663BF5D24EBA02BD45FF at gaalpa1msgusr7e.ugd.att.com>

On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 20:57 -0400, DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS wrote:
> Do you operate a network, that has to interoperate with
> everything...rethink your response. 

Could you explicate this?  I admit that I don't have experience
operating a large-scale network, so it is not clear to me the
constraints that such a network places on solutions to this problem.

Dale

References:
- Re: [Sipping] PRACK: Does non-200 response cease re-transmissionofreliable 18x?
  - From: DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS

Prev by Date: Re: [Sipping] PRACK: Does non-200 response cease re-transmissionofreliable 18x?
Next by Date: Re: [Sipping] Alternate CLF syntax proposal
Previous by thread: Re: [Sipping] PRACK: Does non-200 response cease re-transmissionofreliable 18x?
Next by thread: [Sipping] Fwd: PRACK: Does non-200 response cease re-transmissionofreliable 18x?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread