Re: [Sipping] Alternate CLF syntax proposal

["Dale Worley" <dworley at nortel.com>]

On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 12:42 -0400, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
> That depends on what you think a "Common Log Format" would be useful
> for.  The premise was that it's for troubleshooting and analysis
> systems.  AFAICT, nothing short of the entire SIP message sequence,
> including contents, and even IP/UDP or TCP headers, would be
> sufficient for that in practice.

In our PBX, we've discovered that that is correct.  We do include the
entire SIP message, of course, though we restrict the IP/UDP/TCP
information to the IP address/port of the far end.

Dale