Re: [Sipping] draft-niemi-sipping-event-throttle-08 and forcing notifications when state has not changed

["Brian Rosen" <br at brianrosen.net>]

I would say yes, the intention is to force an update even if nothing
changed.

Brian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sipping-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sipping-bounces at ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Byron Campen
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:00 PM
> To: sipping
> Subject: [Sipping] draft-niemi-sipping-event-throttle-08 and forcing
> notifications when state has not changed
> 
> 	It appears that the normative language in this draft requires the
> notifier to send a notification if the force interval has elapsed, even
> when state has not changed since the last notification. Reading over
> some past discussion on list, I got the impression that this was not
> the intent. So which is it?
> 
> Best regards,
> Byron Campen