Re: [Sipping] FYI: RADIUS & SIP

[<L.Liess at telekom.de>]

Jiri,

I don't understand what is the message of your e-mail. I wrote this
e-mail 2003. It's 6 years ago...

Laura




> -----Original Message-----
> From: sipping-bounces at ietf.org 
> [mailto:sipping-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jiri Kuthan
> Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 10:19 PM
> To: Liess, Laura
> Cc: Dumler, Alexander; aboba at internaut.com; sipping at ietf.org; 
> Wolff, Christian
> Subject: Re: [Sipping] FYI: RADIUS & SIP
> 
> to my best knowledge, iptel.org SIP Express Router's radius 
> implementation
> is quite widely used. We don't trace the use though.
> 
> -jiri
> 
> Liess, Laura wrote:
> > I think most carriers currently use some kind of RADIUS 
> platform to do 
> > user authentication and they would like to reuse it in the 
> future to 
> > authenticate their SIP customers. My colleagues who are 
> responsible for 
> > the RADIUS Platform of the Deutsche Telekom (CC)are currently on 
> > vacation so I could not check with them now about how to 
> answer this 
> > mail, but we already talked about this issue a number of 
> times and my 
> > strong opinion is that "yes, Deutsche Telekom cares a lot 
> about SIP and 
> > RADIUS". Reusing the existing RADIUS platform for SIP 
> authentication is 
> > a strong requirement for the development of SIP services within the 
> > Deutsche Telekom. 
> > Laura (T-Systems/Deutsche Telekom Group) 
> > 
> >> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: Henning Schulzrinne [mailto:hgs at cs.columbia.edu]
> >> Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Juli 2003 09:45
> >> An: sipping at ietf.org
> >> Betreff: [Sipping] FYI: RADIUS & SIP
> >>
> >>
> >> Bernard Aboba <aboba at internaut.com> would like to know 
> about people 
> >> and companies that care about SIP and RADIUS (for authentication). 
> >> There is an attempt afoot to rationalize RADIUS-related 
> efforts within 
> >> the IETF, but there seems to be a lack of representation from SIP 
> >> folks, as per the note to the radius-authors mailing list:
> >>
> >> "I was not clear about the need for SIP/RADIUS work. 
> Apparently there is
> >> ongoing deployment of I-Ds (e.g. the Sterman draft on 
> RADIUS attributes
> >> for HTTP Digest Authentication), so perhaps 
> standardization would be
> >> valuable in documenting what is in use. On the other hand, I also 
> >> heard that "there
> >> isn't much commercial interest." Note sure what to make of 
> this, perhaps
> >> someone can clarify."
> >>
> >> Henning
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sipping mailing list  
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
> >> This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
> >> Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> >> Use sip at ietf.org for new developments of core SIP
> >>
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
> > This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
> > Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> > Use sip at ietf.org for new developments of core SIP
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
> This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
> Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sip at ietf.org for new developments of core SIP
>