Re: [Softwires] [BEHAVE] Some Thought about the AutomaticTunnelAddress

To: eric.burgey at orange-ftgroup.com
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [BEHAVE] Some Thought about the AutomaticTunnelAddress
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:59:53 +1200
Cc: softwires at ietf.org, Fred.L.Templin at boeing.com, behave at ietf.org
Delivered-to: softwires at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nyb8AdaXP40zFffguzqll5Htpm4S+UUn9Sif9chB7/0=; b=KGeJKu+59ywItoVwejsgON9sl8l50OIfYYYgW7smYywg7emnb1bIDVwDmF7bDnCIoI HxnXMMR1pu/7wowHqgO16385io1bcD1Vmme5pgGW8jji9UCbrCILy1Hv+FqTm5eO6xjR oP9jWrQdzgTfByBOBR+nUnHPl4Z01k0OmKY1Y=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=WI9lOag/izsh/F5BB6JBNquTKSyCeITb7+EbqE8lkhydgJOGIqANN//jbGeREV0Ksx STU4r9r2C+XBrBhP3M4zgRpbhFUlETYB8Glc30SUwaPbhTeQeohqymq9siqW8xqjN+Ak N3H859QhwtrUxqpplVceoj0cm9WxxnToFEtao=
In-reply-to: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC162A3BE at ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: University of Auckland
References: <002601ca3745$63c8b710$d40c6f0a at china.huawei.com> <57F95EAE-6705-4B8E-849F-3F35D7239EDD at free.fr> <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1629F33 at ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <12F4112206976147A34FEC0277597CCF27A402C663 at XCH-NW-15V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC162A3BE at ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

Hi Eric,

On 2009-09-19 02:33, eric.burgey at orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
...
> Automatic tunnelling must be limited to a "Site".

If you are referring to ISATAP, that may be a sustainable position.
However, by definition, 6to4 and Teredo involve multiple sites,
for any reasonable definition of site.

    Brian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Softwires] [BEHAVE] Some Thought about the AutomaticTunnelAddress
  - From: Rémi Després

References:
- Re: [Softwires] [BEHAVE] Some Thought about the Automatic TunnelAddress
  - From: Xu Xiaohu
- Re: [Softwires] [BEHAVE] Some Thought about the Automatic TunnelAddress
  - From: Rémi Després
- Re: [Softwires] [BEHAVE] Some Thought about the AutomaticTunnelAddress
  - From: eric.burgey
- Re: [Softwires] [BEHAVE] Some Thought about the AutomaticTunnelAddress
  - From: Templin, Fred L
- Re: [Softwires] [BEHAVE] Some Thought about the AutomaticTunnelAddress
  - From: eric.burgey

Prev by Date: Re: [Softwires] [BEHAVE] Some Thought about the AutomaticTunnelAddress
Next by Date: [Softwires] Call for presentations and participation: CHINA MOBILE WORKSHOP ON IPV6 DEPLOYMENT IN CELLULAR NETWORKS
Previous by thread: Re: [Softwires] [BEHAVE] Some Thought about the AutomaticTunnelAddress
Next by thread: Re: [Softwires] [BEHAVE] Some Thought about the AutomaticTunnelAddress
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [Softwires] [BEHAVE] Some Thought about the AutomaticTunnelAddress

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.