Re: [Softwires] [BEHAVE] Some Thought about the AutomaticTunnelAddress
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Softwires] [BEHAVE] Some Thought about the AutomaticTunnelAddress



Le 18 sept. 09 à 22:59, Brian E Carpenter a écrit :

Hi Eric,

On 2009-09-19 02:33, eric.burgey at orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
...
Automatic tunnelling must be limited to a "Site".

If you are referring to ISATAP, that may be a sustainable position.
However, by definition, 6to4 and Teredo involve multiple sites,
for any reasonable definition of site.

... and we can add 6rd (an ISP IP4 network across which IPv6 is tunneled in 6rd isn't in general considered a "site").

Regards,

RD


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.