Re: [Softwires] [BEHAVE] Some Thought aboutthe AutomaticTunnelAddress

["Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin at boeing.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: behave-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:behave-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rémi Després
> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:55 AM
> To: Brian E Carpenter
> Cc: softwires at ietf.org; eric.burgey at orange-ftgroup.com; behave at ietf.org; Templin, Fred L
> Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] [Softwires] Some Thought aboutthe AutomaticTunnelAddress
> 
> 
> Le 18 sept. 09 à 22:59, Brian E Carpenter a écrit :
> 
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > On 2009-09-19 02:33, eric.burgey at orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
> > ...
> >> Automatic tunnelling must be limited to a "Site".
> >
> > If you are referring to ISATAP, that may be a sustainable position.
> > However, by definition, 6to4 and Teredo involve multiple sites,
> > for any reasonable definition of site.
> 
> ... and we can add 6rd (an ISP IP4 network across which IPv6 is
> tunneled in 6rd isn't in general considered a "site").

That depends on one's definition of "site". I would consider
the ISP network as a site that contains other sites (i.e.,
recursively-nested sites-within-sites).

Fred
fred.l.templin at boeing.com

> 
> Regards,
> 
> RD
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Behave mailing list
> Behave at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave