[Softwires] What is a site? [Re: [BEHAVE]Some Thought about the Automatic Tunnel Address

[Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>]

On 2009-09-29 19:28, Dong Zhang wrote:
...
>> Part of the problem with site-local was that the scope was ambiguous.
> Agree.
>> the term is not rooted in a discrete object with a position in the
>> topology, contrast with autonomous system or prefix.
> Just because of this point, it would better confirm the scope of
> "site" when talking about it in case misunderstanding and confusion.

It may be impossible. Actually I'd be very interested to hear any comments
about the approach to defining address scope that we have taken in
draft-carpenter-behave-referral-object. Maybe what we call a "limited scope"
is a site? This should be discussed at a BOF in Hiroshima. Comments on the
grobj mailing list please:
 grobj at ietf.org
 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grobj .

    Brian