[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Speechsc] RAI review of draft-ietf-speechsc-mrcpv2-19
The reality is that NO ONE has implemented any security to date. The
GENART reviewer raised the same issue, and so far the work group has
the same response: MRCPv2 (the speechsc work group) is not planning on
figuring out which of the seven key exchange mechanisms to use in
SIP. We are counting on the community publishing something, and
people using it. After all, we are the "using SIP for media resource
control" work group, not the "media resource control work group using
something like SIP for control."
Does this work for you?
On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Roni Even wrote:
[snip]
18. In section 12.3 the suggestion is to use SRTP as the mandatory
interoperability mode. If the reason for mandating SRTP is for a
common mode you should also decide on a key exchange mechanism. I
suggest you look athttp://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-02
for discussion on media security.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature