Re: [Speermint] Missing media in draft-hancock-sip-interconnect-guidelines-01.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Speermint] Missing media in draft-hancock-sip-interconnect-guidelines-01.txt



Hi,

I support the comments of Gunnar Hellstrom regarding the need for  strong support of real-time text and video conversational services in addition to voice in the SIP-Interconnect Guidelines.

RFC5012 (ECRIT Requirements) in Section 5 has a requirement Re4 which states:

Re4.  Multi-mode communication:  IP-based emergency calls MUST support multiple communication modes, including, for example,
audio, video, and text.

Motivation: Within the PSTN, voice and text telephony (often called TTY or text-phone in North America) are the only commonly
supported media. Emergency calling must support a variety of media. Such media should include voice, conversational text (RFC
4103 [RFC4103]), instant messaging, and video.
SPEERMINT must support these services at the Interconnect point as part of support of access to Emergency Services if it is to be taken seriously as an alternative Interconnect for public telecommunications based on IP.

/Barry

Barry Dingle
Fellow of University of Melbourne, Electrical and Electronic Eng., Australia
Fixed - +61(0)3-9725-3937    Mob - +61(0)41-911-7578
> Supporter of Linux + Open Source software


On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Gunnar Hellstrom <gunnar.hellstrom at omnitor.se> wrote:
I find it very sad to limit the scope of this specification to audio only,
and ask to widen the scope at least to real-time conversational sessions
including real-time text, video and audio.

One motivation is that the work with emergency service calls in ECRIT
require a possibility to use real-time text, video and audio in emergency
calls. Such calls might need to be routed over a sip interconnection, and
thus need to get full support for its media. ( emergency calls are within
the scope list of this draft. )

There are a number of other valid reasons for this request.

Hoping that it can accepted, I give here a first set of edit proposals to
bring the draft up to proper multimedia status.

****************************************
In 1.1  change from
"1.1.  Scope

  The document focuses on the interworking procedures required to
  support basic telephone service, including the following
  capabilities:

  o  On-net to on-net calls
"
To
"
1.1.  Scope

  The document focuses on the interworking procedures required to
  support basic real-time conversational service, including the following
  capabilities:

  o  Video
  o  Real-time text
  o  On-net to on-net calls
"

In 5.1.1.  change from
"
5.1.1.  SDP Requirements

  SIP entities involved in session peering MUST support the SDP
  requirements defined in [RFC4566].  A SIP entity involved in session
  peering MUST include only one media (m=) descriptor in an SDP offer
  to a peer network.  If a SIP entity involved in session peering
  receives an SDP offer containing multiple media descriptors, it
  SHOULD act on the first audio descriptor with a non-zero port.
"
To
"
5.1.1.  SDP Requirements

  SIP entities involved in session peering MUST support the SDP
  requirements defined in [RFC4566].  A SIP entity involved in session
  peering MUST include only one media (m=) descriptor per desired media
  stream in an SDP offer to a peer network.

  If a SIP entity involved in session peering receives an SDP offer
  containing multiple media descriptors, it MUST act on the media
  descriptors and include all of them in the same order in the
  response, including non-zero ports and zero ports for the offered
  media according to its capabilities as specified in [RFC 3264]
  Offer - Answer model. An offered session MUST NOT be rejected
  because it offers more media than the responding entity can handle.
"

These wew just the apparent initial edits after rapid browsing of the draft.
There is likely more to do to complete the topic.
-

/Gunnar


-----Original Message-----
From: i-d-announce-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces at ietf.org]
On Behalf Of Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 9:00 PM
To: i-d-announce at ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action:draft-hancock-sip-interconnect-guidelines-01.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.

       Title           : draft-hancock-sip-interconnect-guidelines-01
       Author(s)       : D. Hancock, D. Malas
       Filename        : draft-hancock-sip-interconnect-guidelines-01.txt
       Pages           : 25
       Date            : 2009-07-13

As Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) peering becomes more widely accepted by
service providers the need to define an interconnect guideline becomes of
greater value.  This document takes into consideration the SIP and commonly
used SIP extensions, and it defines a fundamental set of requirements for
SIP Service Providers
(SSPs) to implement within their signaling functions (SFs) or Signaling Path
Border Elements (SBEs) for peering.

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hancock-sip-interconnect-guideline
s-01.txt


Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
Internet-Draft.

_______________________________________________
Speermint mailing list
Speermint at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.