Re: [Speermint] I-D Action:draft-ietf-speermint-srv-naptr-use-06.txt

[Daryl Malas <d.malas at cablelabs.com>]

Richard,

You are correct.  This was the approach I was taking, but then I started to
think about how it relates to peering.  We have the draft currently, and I
thought it might fit best in it.  I can still submit an individual draft.
Are there other thoughts on this from anyone else?

Thanks,

Daryl


On 9/14/09 12:00 PM, "Richard Shockey" <richard at shockey.us> wrote:

> Its entirely up to you how you want to proceed. I certainly have no problem
> with this approach though how it fits in with the SPEERMINT charter is
> probably a question and I'd poll Cullen to see what he thinks.  In general
> he certainly understands the application and the need. I was working on the
> assumption that you could submit it as a AD sponsored draft since ENUM is
> being shut down.
> 
> I'll certainly support whatever you guys want to do.
> 
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: speermint-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:speermint-bounces at ietf.org]
>>  On Behalf Of Daryl Malas
>>  Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 12:16 PM
>>  To: speermint at ietf.org; Jason Livingood; Tom Creighton
>>  Subject: [Speermint] Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-speermint-srv-naptr-
>>  use-06.txt
>>  
>>  Jason and Tom,
>>  
>>  The more I think about the draft Tom and I submitted to ENUM
>>  (draft-malas-enum-trunk-sip-00), the more I think it could easily fit
>>  into
>>  this draft.  The concept is simple and just identifies how trunk
>>  groups
>>  should be identified in an ENUM NAPTR response.  I think this will
>>  primarily
>>  be used for peering.
>>  
>>  Thoughts?
>>  
>>  Regards,
>>  
>>  Daryl
>>  
>>  
>>  On 9/11/09 11:45 AM, "Internet-Drafts at ietf.org" <Internet-
>>  Drafts at ietf.org>
>>  wrote:
>>  
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>> directories.
>>> This draft is a work item of the Session PEERing for Multimedia
>>  INTerconnect
>>> Working Group of the IETF.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Title           : Use of DNS SRV and NAPTR Records for SPEERMINT
>>> Author(s)       : T. Creighton, J. Livingood
>>> Filename        : draft-ietf-speermint-srv-naptr-use-06.txt
>>> Pages           : 14
>>> Date            : 2009-09-11
>>> 
>>> The objective of this document is to specify the Best Current
>>> Practice (BCP) adopted by a SSP or other organization providing
>>> multimedia communication services such as Voice over Internet
>>> Protocol(VoIP) in order to locate another SSP to peer with in the
>>> context of Session PEERing for Multimedia INTerconnect.  This
>>> document attempts to fill the gaps in information from RFC 3261, RFC
>>> 3263, and other documents, in order to more assist SSPs in more
>>> easily performing SIP peering.
>>> 
>>> [EDITORIAL NOTE: XREF ERROR GENERATED IN ABSTRACT, XREFS REMOVED]
>>> 
>>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-speermint-srv-naptr-
>>  use-06.txt
>>> 
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>> 
>>> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
>>> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
>>> Internet-Draft.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Speermint mailing list
>>> Speermint at ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint
>>  
>>  
>>  -----------------
>>  Daryl Malas
>>  CableLabs
>>  (o) +1 303 661 3302
>>  (f) +1 303 661 9199
>>  mailto:d.malas at cablelabs.com
>>  
>>  
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Speermint mailing list
>>  Speermint at ietf.org
>>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint
> 


-----------------
Daryl Malas
CableLabs
(o) +1 303 661 3302
(f) +1 303 661 9199
mailto:d.malas at cablelabs.com