Re: [spfbis] new issue: Section 4.4 Parallel Query
Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> Fri, 24 February 2012 02:25 UTC
Return-Path: <hsantos@isdg.net>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EBB11E80A2 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:25:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.171
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.171 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.428, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aMelwCqSN4Mb for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:25:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from secure.winserver.com (mail.winserver.com [208.247.131.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9FC11E80A0 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:25:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=isdg.net; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/relaxed; l=978; t=1330050332; h=Received:Received: Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:To:Subject: List-ID; bh=CuQihpi9VEkR2j/1w/gLAoWGoMk=; b=XP5ohuvwB4snxx7uTkrP bXV91BklFg5U/ni2MLrfIv9z6BlszeCPtdcxLt0ypC5jjHaokxStojgi2Z0iqJmg JiyEJ+dwpxMv7KqT+HGdjLSk4tqUbyJFdcyA2dXYYq+/GAGAGxNfP21aEo9jTrlN DiPk04Uotgx0ZY/UNFwAscg=
Received: by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.4.454.1) for spfbis@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:25:32 -0500
Authentication-Results: dkim.winserver.com; dkim=pass header.d=beta.winserver.com header.s=tms1 header.i=beta.winserver.com; adsp=pass policy=all author.d=isdg.net asl.d=beta.winserver.com;
Received: from opensite.winserver.com ([208.247.131.23]) by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v6.4.454.1) with ESMTP id 3252175497.89717.2616; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:25:31 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=beta.winserver.com; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/relaxed; l=978; t=1330050089; h=Received:Received: Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:To:Subject:List-ID; bh=yKnWi1N 3lJcdp7bYcxACrQZyQM4M30OWa0yblQNqSRQ=; b=BN3732tECWeegncCIDdDOS3 0EL7uIJF32pyZEoYNHVd453lXsISe0Tfqs58OPqWYCsMl5ykDMcQBJmE0il/Mj8s aqbsVLLpWhN6z5uNzZCWEW1/lsTtrytY07/QL8BLhOVxRtPjwwl4ismgsyyqQ4KA 8znrLAcDZyFJMVYGCgT4=
Received: by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.4.454.1) for spfbis@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:21:29 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([99.3.147.93]) by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v6.4.454.1) with ESMTP id 3851111658.19087.3648; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:21:28 -0500
Message-ID: <4F46F530.9020803@isdg.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:25:52 -0500
From: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>
Organization: Santronics Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
References: <4F46A8BF.2060507@isdg.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20120223171037.0ab73808@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120223171037.0ab73808@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: spfbis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spfbis] new issue: Section 4.4 Parallel Query
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:25:43 -0000
S Moonesamy wrote: > Hi Hector, > At 12:59 23-02-2012, Hector Santos wrote: >> I have seen this before and was very curious about how literal is that >> in term of the technical methods used to perform "parallel" queries. >> But with the group postings today related to type SPF and TXT queries >> and terms like "asynchronous" or "Same time" made me think this might >> [be] an item to be clarified. > > The issue which you posted is being tracked as Issue #25. Were these > group postings about Issue #1? Thanks. They were among the issue #9 thread, subject: [spfbis] #9: RFC 4408 SPF RR type. Starting with Philip's data posting: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/msg00573.html Scott's and Levine's follow up: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/msg00574.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/msg00577.html -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com
- [spfbis] new issue: Section 4.4 Parallel Query Hector Santos
- Re: [spfbis] new issue: Section 4.4 Parallel Query S Moonesamy
- Re: [spfbis] new issue: Section 4.4 Parallel Query Hector Santos
- Re: [spfbis] new issue: Section 4.4 Parallel Query Stuart Gathman
- Re: [spfbis] new issue: Section 4.4 Parallel Query Hector Santos