Re: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-06.txt
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 24 April 2012 20:40 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DB711E808A for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.568
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.568 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tml2sSXD-B+w for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2541111E808D for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.232.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3OKeFmB027982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1335300028; i=@elandsys.com; bh=UKTs6dsZ9X3OKJdS/LU6GgaFz4jEx+Uyl6HPZVWq3bE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=W6f+K/Rlav38mkWbSTr7lfNrAE4OV1LmgeN4K06P7M1ZE4IHze+OeEAxQ1NI3sg/D wu5vstW5fGMFgyTvDKPGRV7q6n/oofRTfbLIQpuvsYsnnsN2HlAHDY9axy+/XAWVMs kpqgLpMi5wAlG43q4gFI5aVkNPTuFiGVHVMAswzY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1335300028; i=@elandsys.com; bh=UKTs6dsZ9X3OKJdS/LU6GgaFz4jEx+Uyl6HPZVWq3bE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=spADhBNVh8cSV+dFykE3hxs3Lupjdlqr11NBlAnLxI45ffC1xyPJQb/d1JkPN7czG mXobB8AnY7fe6NgTaSg9B95uvXP1arw/DqSLgI718ksnrl+B75tw3bQ7FLAJsd4tNs iLTEgWSyj6wmV5RWdYeNmPx6C1nIzWmvP/eJDu6w=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120424125542.099efdf0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:37:40 -0700
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F96E994.4050104@tana.it>
References: <20120424165837.3747.64469.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC4RtVC3ivpV7voeva9uEsUmQDpd5hAKN=4CbvftrpPDHqG9Zg@mail.gmail.com> <4F96E994.4050104@tana.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: spfbis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-06.txt
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:40:30 -0000
Hi Alessandro, At 10:57 24-04-2012, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >May I ask how delivering this I-D affects the WG schedule? The I-D is >scheduled for Aug 2012. I like its findings and its conclusions, but Producing a deliverable before its milestone is not a problem. The Chairs have already commented that there is no reason the working group cannot be finished with its deliverables by the Fall. >it still misses some data that may be relevant. So, /if/ there's no >specific reason to ship it now, we could keep it dormant for a few >months and proceed as if it were shipped. That way, that missing data >could have a chance, however remote. A remote chance is like Internet dating. I can safely say that Internet dating is out of scope. :-) There should be at least a month before the IESG Evaluation. Anyone who would like to find any missing data should keep that in mind. Regards, S. Moonesamy
- [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment… internet-drafts
- Re: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experi… Barry Leiba
- Re: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experi… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experi… S Moonesamy
- Re: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experi… Dave Crocker
- Re: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experi… S Moonesamy
- Re: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experi… Dave Crocker
- Re: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experi… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experi… S Moonesamy