[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ssm] Re: draft-chesterfield-avt-rtcpssm

On 4 Jul 2005, at 23:01, Toerless Eckert wrote:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 09:39:32PM +0100, Colin Perkins wrote:
On 4 Jul 2005, at 21:09, Toerless Eckert wrote:
What happened to subject draft ? We really need that type of RTCP
for SSM feedback to get some standardization and move on on SSM ? Is it
just timed out and nobody cares ? How can it be revived ? 

The latest version was draft-ietf-avt-rtcpssm-08.txt, which expired
recently. I'm hoping a revised draft will be available in time for
the next meeting - there has been some discussion on the draft in the
last few days.

Just as a general critique: I don't think that a draft like
draft-ietf-avt-rtcp-feedback should go forward without specifically
detailing whether or how it supports ASM and/or SSM multicast. This draft
only refers to multicast, and that is just not sufficient anymore.

The draft is titled "RTCP Extensions for Single-Source Multicast Sessions with Unicast Feedback", and makes an explicit distinction between ASM and SSM throughout. I'm not sure exactly what else you think it should say?

Colin

_______________________________________________
ssm mailing list
ssm at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm