Re: [Syslog] delineated datagrams was draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls-01.txt

["Tom Petch" <nwnetworks at dial.pipex.com>]

I wonder if others share my concern about the lack of robustness in the way in
which datagrams are delineated in the stream protocol (a TCP rather than a TLS
issue).

The system works as long as
 - the frame length is encoded perfectly
 - the frame length is decoded perfectly
 - no bytes are inserted or removed in error
which is doubtless true in some networks, but I would prefer not to rely on it.

So, when an error occurs, can the Collector/Relay detect it?  Can the
Collector/Relay recover synch?  If not, what does the Collector/Relay do?

There is very little redundancy in the definition of frame length, and syslog
messages have very little structure to help the application, so I think that
this is an issue we should address.

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "David B Harrington" <dbharrington at comcast.net>
To: <syslog at ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 4:26 PM
Subject: [Syslog] draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls-01.txt


Hi,

A new revision of the syslog/TLS draft is available.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls-01
.txt

We need reviewers.
Can we get
1) a person to check the grammar?
2) a person to check the syslog technical parts?
3) a person to check compatibility with the other WG documents?
4) a person to check the TLS technical parts?

We also need general reviews of the document by multiple people.

Thanks,
David Harrington
co-chair, Syslog WG
ietfdbh at comcast.net


_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog


_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog