Re: [Syslog] sequenceId and relaying
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Syslog] sequenceId and relaying
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:07 +0200, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the intent is end-to-end. It got mangled during the "name wars" of syslog application/sender/receiver/originator etc. To restore the original meaning, we could do (during auth48 if there is consensus):
>
> ###
> The "sequenceId" parameter tracks the sequence in which the ***originator*** submits
> ###
>
> Anything beyond this is for the next version. I violently object any change that brings us out of the RFC editor publishing queue after we have finally reached this state after years and years... I say this even though I tend to agree to Bazsi on many points.
This is ok for me at this point of time, I'll act accordingly.
However I see some ambiguities with relays and how relays are permitted
to change messages, especially with syslog-sign in mind.
--
Bazsi
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.