Re: [Syslog] syslog WG meeting minutes (proposed)

[fenghongyan <hongyanfeng at huaweisymantec.com>]

Hi Chris,

I remembered that the wg will take "draft-feng-syslog-transport-dtls" as the basic start of wg's work on syslog-dtls,
does it not make as the wg's decision?

If my memory is wrong, I would like recommend highly that take my proposal as the start of the wg's work, since my proposal has aligned with RFC 5425 (syslog/tls). I would like also contribute myself on the work of syslog-dtls.



Linda

----- Original Mail -----
>  Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
>  From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick at cisco.com>
>  Subject: [Syslog] syslog WG meeting minutes (proposed)
>  To: syslog at ietf.org
>  Cc: pasi.eronen at nokia.com
>  Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0907300746180.29422 at sjc-cde-011.cisco.com>
>  Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>  
>  Hi Folks,
>  
>  Here are the meeting minutes that I took.  Please send back edits if 
> you 
>  want anything changed.
>  
>  ===
>  Meeting was started, blue sheets passed around, no one in jabber room 
> 
>  other than the people in the room.
>  
>  Chairs went through the slides.
>  
>  Q about syslog/BEEP on slide 10: We're not proposing to standardize 
> this; 
>  it's already RFC 3195.  Since the uptake on implementation (of this 
> RFC, 
>  and of BEEP overall) is low, then the WG should consider moving the 
> RFC to 
>  HISTORIC.
>  
>  Jurgen S. gave a review of his thoughts on the proposed new charter items:
>  Slide 8,
>    MIB, OK
>    DHCP, has some operational value
>    don't need an architectural reference to be done in the IETF
>  Slide 9
>    might be interesting to have a guideline but not sure who would commit
>  the time to do that
>    DTLS, should be done and aligned with RFC 5425 (syslog/tls)
>    syslog/tcp, should be very straightforward and easy to do
>    syslog/BEEP, declare HISTORIC
>  
>  Dan R. - Since syslog WG is proposing to do syslog/DTLS is there 
> enough 
>  commonality so that ISMS/DTLS and IPFIX/DTLS can re-use?
>    - Consensus was that this was likely.  David also noted that the others
>  are also doing SCTP.
>  
>  Pasi E. - syslog/DTLS should be easy since it will draw directly from 
> 
>  syslog/TLS.
>    - IPFIX also working on Dead Peer Detection (DTLS Heartbeet), we should
>  likely support this as well.
>    - There were problems with the previous IPFIX/DTLS but that was because
>  of bad libraries in OpenSSL which have since been fixed.
>  
>  Wes H. - there is not that much commonality between the schemes 
> because of 
>  a lot of useage details.
>  
>  Chris and David have asked Joe Saloway to act as WG editor for the 
> DTLS 
>  work.
>  
>  Meeting adjurned at 10am.
>  
>  ===
>  
>  Thanks,
>  Chris
>  
>  
>  ------------------------------
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Syslog mailing list
>  Syslog at ietf.org
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
>  
>  
>  End of Syslog Digest, Vol 47, Issue 10
>  **************************************
>