Re: [Syslog] Matters arising was: Re: syslog WG meeting minutes(proposed)

[Gerhard Muenz <muenz at net.in.tum.de>]

Hi,

It seems that syslog is struggling with issues IPFIX has already gone
through. It might be worth looking at RFC5101 and the wording in Section
10.3 about IPFIX-over-UDP:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5101#section-10.3.1

Regards,
Gerhard

> 
> Hi,
> 
> To clarify a point ...
> syslog/tls is not simply RECOMMENDED; it is MANDATORY TO IMPLEMENT.
> 
> syslog/dtls will be an optional transport; we do not need to RECOMMEND
> it.
> Implementers can decide for themselves whether to implement it.
> I agree that the IESG may not approve it with congestion control
> considerations.
> 
> dbh 
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature