Re: [tcpm] ECN+SYN

[Stefanos Harhalakis <v13 at v13.gr>]

On Thursday 06 March 2008, Sally Floyd wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2008, at 1:53 PM, Stefanos Harhalakis wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 February 2008, Sally Floyd wrote:
> >> In summary, I would be *strongly* opposed to any proposal
> >> for TCP SYN packets to be sent as ECN-capable.
> >
> > Hello Sally and thank you for your detailed and explanatory reply!
>
> ...
>
> >  I suggest that the draft:
> > a) Do not forbid ECT for SYN segments
> > b) Propose the usage of ECT for SYN segments
>
> I am sorry, but I would still be strongly opposed to this.

Hello again,

  I respect your experience and I blindly accept your opinion (re: the draft) 
since is most probably based on greater knowledge than mine. I'm also very 
stubborn and reserve the right to research this a bit more and either prove 
myself wrong or come back with more solid arguments :-) 

  Either way, I'll keep the list (tcpm) informed.

Thank you for your time,
Harhalakis Stefanos
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm