Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks) to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks) to Proposed Standard



Hi, authors,

it's been over a month since the IETF last call ended, and I have not seen a document revision or even an attempt at discussing the comments you have received. Please start this discussion and eventually revise the document.

Thanks,
Lars

On 2009-4-17, at 5:11, Eggert Lars (Nokia-NRC/Espoo) wrote:

Hi, authors,

the IETF last call has ended, and it looks like the few comments I've
seen will require some text changes, so I'm placing this document in
the Revised ID Needed state.

Also: Has the discussion of the comments that Fernando made concluded?

Lars


On 2009-4-2, at 18:07, The IESG wrote:

The IESG has received a request from the TCP Maintenance and Minor
Extensions WG (tcpm) to consider the following document:

- 'Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks '
 <draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-11.txt> as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to
the
ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-04-16. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to iesg at ietf.org instead. In either case, please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-11.txt


IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=11735&rfc_flag=0

The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/421/


_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

<smime.p7s><ATT00001.txt>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.