Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks) to Proposed Standard

["Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth at cisco.com>]

Lars,
   There were some comments by Sandra Murphy which we have had
discussion. I had already responded to Fernando's comments and the
agreed upon comments are being incorporated. 
   That said, I agree that we have been slow in getting the next
revision for which I sincerely apologize, well for a change this time it
is us!  
-Anantha 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Eggert [mailto:lars.eggert at nokia.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 8:02 PM
> To: tcpm at ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure at tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure 
> (Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks) to 
> Proposed Standard
> 
> Hi, authors,
> 
> it's been over a month since the IETF last call ended, and I 
> have not seen a document revision or even an attempt at 
> discussing the comments you have received. Please start this 
> discussion and eventually revise the document.
> 
> Thanks,
> Lars
> 
> On 2009-4-17, at 5:11, Eggert Lars (Nokia-NRC/Espoo) wrote:
> 
> > Hi, authors,
> >
> > the IETF last call has ended, and it looks like the few 
> comments I've 
> > seen will require some text changes, so I'm placing this 
> document in 
> > the Revised ID Needed state.
> >
> > Also: Has the discussion of the comments that Fernando made 
> concluded?
> >
> > Lars
> >
> >
> > On 2009-4-2, at 18:07, The IESG wrote:
> >
> >> The IESG has received a request from the TCP Maintenance and Minor 
> >> Extensions WG (tcpm) to consider the following document:
> >>
> >> - 'Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks '
> >>  <draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-11.txt> as a Proposed Standard
> >>
> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, 
> and solicits 
> >> final comments on this action.  Please send substantive 
> comments to 
> >> the ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-04-16. Exceptionally, 
> >> comments may be sent to iesg at ietf.org instead. In either 
> case, please 
> >> retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow 
> automated sorting.
> >>
> >> The file can be obtained via
> >> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-11.txt
> >>
> >>
> >> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> >> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dT
> >> ag=11735&rfc_flag=0
> >>
> >> The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D:
> >>
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/421/
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> tcpm mailing list
> >> tcpm at ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
> >
> > <smime.p7s><ATT00001.txt>
> 
>