Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks) to Proposed Standard

["Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth at cisco.com>]

Fernando,
    I will summarize all the comments which have been incorporated when
I post the next revision. I have no issues trying out the <?rfc
iprnotified="yes"?> suggestion by Brian. My email to Lars was primarily
to say that "there have been discussions about the comments and the next
revision is work in progress"
    Does that clarify?
-Anantha

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fernando Gont 
> [mailto:fernando.gont.netbook.win at gmail.com] On Behalf Of 
> Fernando Gont
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 3:00 PM
> To: Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)
> Cc: Lars Eggert; tcpm at ietf.org; 
> draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure at tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure 
> (Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks) to 
> Proposed Standard
> 
> Anantha Ramaiah (ananth) wrote:
> 
> >    There were some comments by Sandra Murphy which we have had 
> > discussion. I had already responded to Fernando's comments and the 
> > agreed upon comments are being incorporated.
> 
> IIRC, there had been comments from Brian Carpenter about 
> specific requirements for text in RFC 3979. Here's a quote 
> from Brian's post:
> 
> 
> > Personal belief doesn't come into it. It's strictly defined 
> in a BCP.
> > RFC3979 tells us the rules about this. Basically, the RFC 
> Editor will 
> > do what is required:
> >
> > "4.  Actions for Documents for which IPR Disclosure(s) Have Been
> >      Received
> >
> >    (A) When any Intellectual Property Right is disclosed before
> >        publication as an  RFC, with respect to any technology or
> >        specification, described in a Contribution in the manner set
> >        forth in Section 6 of this document, the RFC Editor shall
> >        ensure
> >        that the document include a note indicating the existence of
> >        such
> >        claimed Intellectual Property Rights in any RFC 
> published from
> >        the Contribution.  (See Section 5 below.)"
> >
> > [Section 5 defines the exact text to be included in such RFCs.
> > I believe you can use <?rfc iprnotified="yes"?> in xml2rfc.]
> 
> 
> I'm not sure what's the chairs' and ADs' take on this issue.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Kind regards,
> --
> Fernando Gont
> e-mail: fernando at gont.com.ar || fgont at acm.org PGP 
> Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
> 
> 
> 
> 
>