[tcpm] poll for adoption of SACK recovery entry drafty
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[tcpm] poll for adoption of SACK recovery entry drafty



Hello, the authors of the SACK Recovery Entry draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jarvinen-tcpm-sack-recovery-entry-01
have given a couple presentations to the WG now and asked if it
could be considered as an item for the WG for Proposed Standard (at
least I'm assuming PS because the I-D says "Intended Status: Standards
Track" ...).  If I'm not mistaken, there has been some positive feedback
on the most recent incarnation, though not a lot, and not really any
negative feedback that I could see.

As chairs, David and I are asking the WG to voice whether we should:

A) adopt this as a WG item for Proposed Standard
B) NOT adopt this as a WG item
C) wait to decide (not ready)

Please let us know what you think.

---------------------------
Wes Eddy
Network & Systems Architect
Verizon FNS / NASA GRC
Office: (216) 433-6682
---------------------------

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.