Re: [tcpm] WG Last Call for ICMP Attacks
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tcpm] WG Last Call for ICMP Attacks
The distinction is from SANS classes but also commonly used in network forensics.
Crafted implies it wasn't created naturally by an OS.
A "special" tool is required to "craft" the packets.
A crafted packet MIGHT have also had its source IP forged.
So I see "forged or spoofed" as a subset of crafted packets.
"ICMP packet with falsified content" would be a good description.
(coffee != sleep) & (!coffee == sleep)
Donald.Smith at qwest.com gcia
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Touch [mailto:touch at ISI.EDU]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 3:09 PM
> To: Smith, Donald
> Cc: 'David Borman'; 'tcpm Extensions WG'
> Subject: Re: [tcpm] WG Last Call for ICMP Attacks
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Smith, Donald wrote:
> > 1.
> > ICMP [RFC0792] is a fundamental part of the TCP/IP protocol suite,
> > and is used mainly for reporting network error conditions.
> >
> > ICMP is part of the IP protocol suite.
> >
> > 2.2
> > Therefore, in the case of TCP, an attacker could send a forged ICMP
> > message to the attacked system, and, as long as he is
> able to guess
> > the four-tuple (i.e., Source IP Address, Source TCP
> port, Destination
> > IP Address, and Destination TCP port) that identifies the
> > communication instance to be attacked, he will be able
> to use ICMP to
> > perform a variety of attacks.
> >
> > Forged usually implies that source ip address has been
> spoofed usually to come from some type of trusted host.
> > Crafted is the term generally used to mean the packets
> contents (not header) were modified.
> > In this case there is no need to spoof the source ip
> address as the end host has no knowledge about the routers in
> between them and the end host system. So I recommend you
> change forged to crafted.
>
> I've not heard that there was such clarity on the term forged or
> crafted, but neither is the case here.
>
> The attacker emits an ICMP message. It doesn't need a
> falsified header.
> It doesn't need to be a "modified" packet. E.g., it can be
> created based
> on information seen on the media.
>
> It might just be called a "false ICMP message", i.e., it's
> reporting an
> event that didn't happen.
>
> Joe
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkqe3t0ACgkQE5f5cImnZrvj4QCeLodfjABk7/bGxLSU9wv4dV+N
> 0foAoJ5qPOCkzsS/w0kvpuOzJdChMcCb
> =BJU2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.