Re: [tcpm] poll for adoption of SACK recovery entry drafty

[Alexander Zimmermann <Alexander.Zimmermann at nets.rwth-aachen.de>]

Hi all,

since I have the feeling my last mail sent from my mobile is missing,
I vote again:

a) adopt this as a WG item for Proposed Standard

Alex

Am 01.09.2009 um 21:30 schrieb Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[Verizon]:

> Hello, the authors of the SACK Recovery Entry draft:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jarvinen-tcpm-sack-recovery-entry-01
> have given a couple presentations to the WG now and asked if it
> could be considered as an item for the WG for Proposed Standard (at
> least I'm assuming PS because the I-D says "Intended Status: Standards
> Track" ...).  If I'm not mistaken, there has been some positive  
> feedback
> on the most recent incarnation, though not a lot, and not really any
> negative feedback that I could see.
>
> As chairs, David and I are asking the WG to voice whether we should:
>
> A) adopt this as a WG item for Proposed Standard
> B) NOT adopt this as a WG item
> C) wait to decide (not ready)
>
> Please let us know what you think.
>
> ---------------------------
> Wes Eddy
> Network & Systems Architect
> Verizon FNS / NASA GRC
> Office: (216) 433-6682
> ---------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm