Re: [tcpm] poll for adoption of long connectivity disruptions draft

[Joe Touch <touch at ISI.EDU>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Overall, I think this is OK to adopt as experimental.

Joe

Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[Verizon] wrote:
> Hello, the authors of the "Long Connectivity Disruptions" draft:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zimmermann-tcp-lcd-02.txt
> have given a couple presentations to the WG now and asked if it
> could be considered as an item for the WG for Experimental.  If
> I'm not mistaken, there has been some positive feedback on the
> most recent incarnation, though not a lot, and not really any
> negative feedback that I could see.
> 
> As chairs, David and I are asking the WG to voice whether we should:
> 
> A) adopt this as a WG item for Experimental
> B) NOT adopt this as a WG item
> C) wait to decide (not ready)
> 
> Please let us know what you think.
> 
> ---------------------------
> Wes Eddy
> Network & Systems Architect
> Verizon FNS / NASA GRC
> Office: (216) 433-6682
> ---------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqm338ACgkQE5f5cImnZrvw5wCePT223F7qQ5gLm5LqINpsg5ec
wLYAn0TglLIzpERb+vd/5ZLaknbSGBSQ
=pl3Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----