Re: [tcpm] poll for adoption of long connectivity disruptions draft
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tcpm] poll for adoption of long connectivity disruptions draft
On Sep 9, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Alexander Zimmermann wrote:
* The title would benefit from some tweaking. Maybe its just a matter
of changing "Make" => "Making"
Ok, we will change the title to "Making TCP more Robust to Long
Connectivity
Disruptions". I'm also fine with changing it to something completely
different,
are there any suggestions?
No. I think "Making TCP..." is just fine.
* Section 4.2, algorithm: this is really a nit, but might want to
clarify in step (5) that if ICMP DU contains non-TCP header it should
be ignored, without affecting the algorithm (right?)
In our algorithm we assume that the ICMP error message is passed
up from the IP layer, for the corresponding connection.
(See RFC 1122 Section 4.2.3.9 ). Ack, we will make this more clear.
However, I think the fact that the ICMP message already got
demultiplexed implies that the ICMP DU contains a TCP header,
otherwise
we would "not see" this ICMP DU at this layer.
You are right, but I guess details might depend on implementation. And
there might be possibilities for further optimization with non-TCP
generated ICMPs, as per Joe's earlier mail.
* It would be interesting to have an accompanying technical report on
some (even preliminary) results on the performance improvements using
the algorithm. It would also be interesting to have some
understanding
how often ICMP Destination unreachables actually arrive in case of a
real connectivity disruption in real world.
Depends on what you mean with "real world" we have already presented
some measurements with Linux routers, see the slides from the last
IETF meetings. And the ICMP DU arrive surprisingly reliable.
However, we did not test juniper or cisco yet...
Yep, the graphs in the meeting slides are nice. As an optional further
step (if someone had the time) they could be wrapped with some
explanatory text into a paper format to be used as a reference for
people trying to assess the benefits.
Regarding "real world", I had something like today's 3G & WiFi
networks in mind.
- Pasi
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.