Re: [tcpm] AD Review: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-09

[Lars Eggert <lars.eggert at nokia.com>]

Hi,

On 2010-1-29, at 11:32, Eggert Lars (Nokia-NRC/Espoo) wrote:
> On 2010-1-28, at 23:43, Fernando Gont wrote:
>>> If yes, then with delayed ACKs (or otherwise in corner cases)
>>> acked_packet_size is actually larger than maxsizesent always. 
>> 
>> Well, that depends on the amount of data you send. But yes, you could
>> say that "acked_packet_size is actually larger than maxsizesent *usually*".
>> 
>>> On
>>> second reading, I don't think that's a problem for the technique, but
>>> the name and description of the variable confused me earlier.
>> 
>> Should I add a clarification?
> 
> I think this would make sense. You might also want to change the name of the variable.

this is the only issue I haven't seen addressed in -10.

I'll start the IETF Last Call based on -10 now; we can work out the few remaining issues (incl. this one) in parallel.

Lars

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature