![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Michael Welzl wrote: >> Agreed. The point is to what extent TCP is modified for fractional >> benefits for specific communities. TCP is "optimized" to always work, >> but not to work especially well in any particular environment. > > Yeah... stupid, isn't it? I'll trade "always" or even "usually" to "works very well in some places, but not at all in others". Making TCP smarter is fine; doing so at the expense of robustness is not. Joe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature