Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning

To: Joe Touch <touch at isi.edu>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
From: Adam Langley <agl at imperialviolet.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:48:20 -0500
Cc: tcpm at ietf.org, Kacheong Poon <kacheong.poon at sun.com>, Michael Welzl <michawe at ifi.uio.no>
Delivered-to: tcpm at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=jcqXrr2dyhjz0fdfw37HnMTkKSMnfG/5pKG7V+QJ2sw=; b=QwxLNXS47/oOEtgEoxqSEKK08+IkvJyWNzp/XbJq0JKpVtXB/6TmmKgiLuT2Zv0Jzj ksu7bQqv9Z1Z9FDVuXdRGrd1vqDIKXS7idDlVVeYj2tNRqCYqkAZaKBYhuBtxc1rf/Qw 6fryCtTkhDpNfoMSzERbz9u7V0YCfO8rOk52k=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=dPqMCmIzHfLv3OZ2NoBQChmrwcp+r4/dFAlELBC4fM7y1pCe9jLrPAHDJIiA2GTfZf vgqBR5wNxQB4MdZ6q2eV7qlTKs/ZXSMB3N8kENYnS8D+PZb2tLI+YZ0AgwWT5juHZmlR 6iY8YOxBXheNUHWwAcM5AhLZ0fIEM7pKS2d20=
In-reply-to: <4B69B5AC.1090209 at isi.edu>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7BE9742D-6EDC-43FE-84FC-D22C52D23152 at nokia.com> <4B69A53E.2050508 at isi.edu> <4B69ACD9.1030105 at sun.com> <4B69AE64.8070608 at isi.edu> <10EDB15A-0DF6-45EE-897C-E38AA611134C at ifi.uio.no> <4B69B030.3000508 at isi.edu> <D70C30EF-91E3-4DB6-B0C7-0A6328C77E6A at ifi.uio.no> <4B69B5AC.1090209 at isi.edu>
Sender: alangley at gmail.com

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Joe Touch <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
> IMO, I would encourage Google to take their work there and get feedback
> there first. TCPM is a place where mature, vetted ideas should be
> considered, preferably (IMO).

I think an important part of the presentation is that this is already
a very well vetted idea: by using multiple subdomains and concurrent
connections, HTTP has already increased the initcwnd drastically.

AGL

-- 
Adam Langley agl at imperialviolet.org http://www.imperialviolet.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
  - From: Michael Welzl
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
  - From: Joe Touch

References:
- [tcpm] TCP tuning
  - From: Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
  - From: Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
  - From: Kacheong Poon
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
  - From: Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
  - From: Michael Welzl
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
  - From: Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
  - From: Michael Welzl
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
  - From: Joe Touch

Prev by Date: Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
Next by Date: Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
Previous by thread: Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
Next by thread: Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.