Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 10 May 2015 02:11 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596991A883D for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 May 2015 19:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kuqL986eENLA for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 May 2015 19:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 801071B2BE2 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 May 2015 19:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wizk4 with SMTP id k4so68706636wiz.1 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sat, 09 May 2015 19:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=buOZzwTP4lJaqHp6P/E5of+vEc7uANq1qNDdH4JXZyU=; b=0KBTpJrElMLa420pl6zs3GpDwPqpHZAJM+RO5qTmGzG6fV4M/KCb4MmGEc7o9OTJrI Fg09E57yQhgUHlRosSO+CLxlXtOSuwhb3tQLUiYuj1xXVJRfN/tVeTKz34UC2vbYZxWM OGoKkKsnNgpFEYDfaBd23x7QIlrLFO7zzKvAJfo6yadCFbSIFeV6cgnyECW75iU+kx4r 3TJS+PLeYbNMEp86XvN5WB596yHs8lra0xSbb9KCyNYYYbwd/2T32uANCdYv7xpcUvOI Dr/xUkdJG+kohz4okn9W98+nX10MwYeDSU+emQOmLUYsj31SBq2jmfduFilgFSZ5QNnX EJqA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.7.133 with SMTP id j5mr8537972wia.84.1431223915205; Sat, 09 May 2015 19:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.93.198 with HTTP; Sat, 9 May 2015 19:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTt=C9rzmnr9jJVAwHJp7V+TMyFe7v3fesCKgxUzEYqakw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+YzgTt=C9rzmnr9jJVAwHJp7V+TMyFe7v3fesCKgxUzEYqakw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 07:41:55 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: EbjMASIQLJ9uW0p810WwGE2PALw
Message-ID: <CAB75xn5FGR1KdqeXDkMEVq2DL+eqGdThdrWzw2-R+F1angwEsw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1130d1be0f589a0515b0c933"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/UmSjSLBiJiT1vj-G_pYPZZEpoME>
Cc: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, Udayasree palle <udayasree.palle@huawei.com>, Venugopal Reddy K <venugopalreddyk@huawei.com>, Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 02:11:58 -0000

Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2186/

Regards,
Dhruv


On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Authors, Contributors, (and TEAS WG),
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
>   Please state either:
>
>   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>   or
>   "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
>    If yes to the above, please state either:
>
>   "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>   or
>   "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
>   If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>   appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
> MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the TEAS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules
> which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
> others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
> contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more
> information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
>  TEAS WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>