RE: [Techspec] Editorial notes on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt

["Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS)" <stephen.hayes at ericsson.com>]

Paul Hoffman wrote
>     o  Req-PREEDIT-1: The IETF technical publisher should perform an
>        editorial review of documents before WG last call and provide
>        feedback to the authors to improve quality of the 
> documents.  This
>        review should strive to maintain consistency in appearance with
>        previously published documents.
> The phrase "should perform" is quite different than "should support". 
> It seems that the consensus was that this should be done, so "should 
> perform" is correct.

I agree, the current wording is too strong.  Even if IETF decides to go down the pre-approval review route, it is not clear what documents you would use it on.  It is certainly a stretch to assume all WG docs would be pre-approved.  It is also unclear that it is only WG docs that could have pre-approval review.  I will change the wording to indicate that is it something the technical publisher should do when requested by appropriate technical representatives.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --VPN Consortium
> 

_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
Techspec at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec