[Techspec] Re: RFC Editor SOW Review
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Techspec] Re: RFC Editor SOW Review
Stewart Bryant wrote:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
The SOW will be aligned with the final version
of draft-mankin-pub-req, whose text has been adjusted
for this point in version 10.
I just greped v10 and there is no reference to pdf, nor to ps,
nor to RFC2223.
Your grep missed "text, portable document format (pdf), etc.)"
The text in section 3.9 in V10 seems ambiguous and should
align with RFC2223 - Instructions to RFC Authors
It's meant to be wide enough to contain current practice but
not limit us to current practice.
Since RFC 2223 is very old and there are two drafts
proposing to update it, we can't use it as a stable reference
for generic requirements.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
Techspec at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.