[TICTOC] [Fwd: Re: [ntpwg] NTP WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt-03.txt]

[Todd Glassey <tglassey at earthlink.net>]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] NTP WG Last 
Call:draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt-03.txt
Date: 	Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:43:15 -0700
From: 	Todd Glassey <tglassey at earthlink.net>
To: 	hundoj at comcast.net
CC: 	Greg Dowd <GDowd at symmetricom.com>, ntpwg at lists.ntp.org, 
tictoc at ietf.org
References: 
<AE47D7F85F757B46BDDB9D9366F991C0011C54C2 at naeamillez05v.nadsusea.nads.navy.mil> 
<4A4D3484.8030809 at innovationslab.net> 
<CB45EB047BD43041BF1F4CC7D6DB21BF029782AC at sjmail2.symmetricom.com> 
<20090716193658.L1075 at bulldog.localhost.org>



Rob Neal wrote:
> I support it as well. Go forward, please.
>
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Greg Dowd wrote:
>
>   
> > I support the advancement of this draft.
> >
> >     
I dont - the design of NTP is flawed from an evidence perspective and 
the point of this draft is to securely interface NTP to DHCP which 
serves the interests of only those members of this entity who support 
the continued advancement of NTP in its current vein - i.e. with code 
from the ISC and through the licensing problems which exist now because 
the IETF's copyrights are now the controlling ones on the NTP standard.

Sorry - I DO NOT support the advancement of this draft since it actually 
serves only to increase the value of proprietary code and not advance 
NTP. It also totally glosses over that NEA the Network Enablement.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tictoc-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:tictoc-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf
> > Of Brian Haberman
> > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 3:28 PM
> > To: Odonoghue, Karen F CIV NSWCDD, W23; NTP Working Group
> > Cc: tictoc at ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [TICTOC] [ntpwg] NTP WG Last
> > Call:draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt-03.txt
> >
> > All,
> >      This LC ended over a month ago with no comments.  We cannot
> > advance a document to the IESG if there is no support for it (silence is
> >
> > not consensus).  If you support (or object) to the advancement of this
> > document we need to hear it, preferably on the mailing list but
> > privately to the chairs is acceptable.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Brian
> >
> > Odonoghue, Karen F CIV NSWCDD, W23 wrote:
> >     
> > > All,
> > >
> > > This message starts a 2-week NTP Working Group Last Call on advancing:
> > >
> > >        Title     : Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for
> > >       
> > DHCPv6
> >     
> > >        Author(s) : R. Gayraud and B. Lourdelet
> > >        Filename  : draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt-03.txt
> > >        Pages     : 10
> > >        Date      : March 6, 2009
> > >
> > > as a Proposed Standard document.  Substantive comments and statements
> > >       
> > of support or opposition for advancing this document should be directed
> > to the mailing list.  Editorial suggestions can be sent to the document
> > editor.  This last call will end on May 20.
> >     
> > > Regards,
> > > Brian & Karen
> > > NTP co-chairs
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >       
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ntpwg mailing list
> > > ntpwg at lists.ntp.org
> > > https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg
> > >       
> > _______________________________________________
> > TICTOC mailing list
> > TICTOC at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
> > _______________________________________________
> > ntpwg mailing list
> > ntpwg at lists.ntp.org
> > https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg
> >
> >     
> _______________________________________________
> ntpwg mailing list
> ntpwg at lists.ntp.org
> https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.17/2242 - Release Date: 07/16/09 18:00:00
>
>