RE: [TLS] extension number conflict
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [TLS] extension number conflict



I'm not sure how to take this.

Is it considered inappropriate to talk openly about possibilities.
I can whitness that as implementer this can be a problem. I don't consider it severe enought to go through the trouble of writing an I-D about it, but it's good the hear others experiances.

/Stefan
________________________________________
From: Paul Hoffman [paul.hoffman at vpnc.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 4:43 PM
To: Stefan Santesson; Mike; tls at ietf.org
Subject: RE: [TLS] extension number conflict

At 12:01 AM +0000 2/9/07, Stefan Santesson wrote:
>What about assigning an experimental/local range that can be used
>until the real number is assigned.
>That should avoid conflicts effectively.

If you want to make a change to how the numbers are assigned, you
should write an Internet Draft to change the procedure and bring it
to the TLS WG. "What about this" and "how about that" are fairly
meaningless when there is already rules that people agreed to on how
to do this.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.