![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Simon Josefsson wrote: > I'm not convinced of that. It is useful for TLS library APIs to be > consistent with the TLS protocol. Your proposal was to add the > GSS-API negotiation after the TLS handshake. I believe that by negotiating TLS_XXX_GSS_YYY it is implicit that the TLS library API must not return until after the GSS handshake has completed. Otherwise, what is the point of adding the new cipher suite designator? Jeffrey Altman
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls