Re: [TLS] Short Ephermal Diffie-Hellman keys

To: lists at drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk, tls at lists.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Short Ephermal Diffie-Hellman keys
From: pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz (Peter Gutmann)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 15:49:51 +1200
Cc:
In-reply-to: <4649D2FD.2020309@drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk>
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Dr Stephen Henson <lists at drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk> writes:

>Speaking of which what do people think about including the sub prime value
>(aka "q") as an optional value in DH parameters in a TLS 1.2 handshake?

It's a good idea, I've been wanting that for awhile (SSH should be doing this
as well).

Peter.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

References:
- Re: [TLS] Short Ephermal Diffie-Hellman keys
  - From: Dr Stephen Henson

Prev by Date: Re: [TLS] Short Ephermal Diffie-Hellman keys
Next by Date: [TLS] RE: Short Ephermal Diffie-Hellman keys
Previous by thread: Re: [TLS] Short Ephermal Diffie-Hellman keys
Next by thread: [TLS] Straw poll on TLS SRP status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [TLS] Short Ephermal Diffie-Hellman keys

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.