RE: [TLS] Straw poll on TLS SRP status

[Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org>]

At 11:05 AM +0300 5/29/07, <Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com> wrote:
> Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
> >  >Note that I don't think that "Informational/Experimental is better."
> >  >but rather that it is what the WG has done in the past, and the WG
> >  >should remain consistent, or else the chairs should explain why they
> >  >insisted on it before and are now not doing so.
> >
> >  Fully agree. And I think it is appropriate to delay the decision on
> >  tls-srp until we have made that decision. Such a delay will not
> >  affect developers significantly.
>
> While it's relatively easy to sort documents to "IPR-affected" and
> "no significant IPR issues known" buckets, do you have any suggestions
> about what kinds of rules you would want for sorting documents
> to "Standards Track" and "Informational/Experimental" buckets?

My preference is "IPR-affected" all go into the 
"Informational/Experimental" bucket. My main reasons for that are:

- It will stop this repetitive discussion

- The "lower" status of Informational or Experimental is irrelevant 
to users but seems relevant to some developers

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls