Re: [TLS] Straw poll on TLS SRP status

[Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester at edelweb.fr>]

Peter Gutmann wrote:
> <
> I'll reply publicly in order to provide a rationale: Arguments against it
> becoming a full standard are that this spec has been around for six years now
> without any significant implementations appearing (apologies to the authors of
> GnuTLS and TLS Lite :-).  
Sorry to disagree, since 3 years there exist also implementations for 
openssl and java,
the java one is used in jboss as far as I understand the manuals. 
Whether people use it,
who knows.
I got tired to follow each openssl version and maintain the patch, I 
understand that
the maintainers don't want to include the stuff before there is a stable 
status of
the specification. And seeing that ciphersuites had been reserved by 
IANA but not
the extension number, on 26.6.2006 I asked IANA

This discussion is the first time in 4 years that some almost technical 
discussion
takes place, at least.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls