![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
At Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:25:00 +0200, Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen wrote:I think this:
"The client SHOULD also verify that the DH public exponent appears to be
of adequate size."
ought to be worded stronger, perhaps something like
"The client SHOULD also verify that the DH public exponent is of equvalent cryptograhic strength as the key used to sign the public key."
I actually do not agree with this position. There are valid reasons to use long signing keys and shorter key establishment keys.
Maybe.
-- Sincerely, Yngve N. Pettersen
******************************************************************** Senior Developer Email: yngve at opera.com Opera Software ASA http://www.opera.com/ Phone: +47 24 16 42 60 Fax: +47 24 16 40 01 ********************************************************************
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls