Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-rfc4346-bis (The Transport

[Nelson B Bolyard <nelson at bolyard.com>]

Eric Rescorla wrote, On 2008-03-06 08:32:
> At Thu, 06 Mar 2008 07:37:28 -0800, Mike wrote:

>> There seem to be a lot of strong feelings against SHA-224.
>> I looked at the FIPS amendment which defines it, and it
>> doesn't appear to be such a horrible thing.  Can someone
>> explain how NIST got it so wrong?
> 
> It's not *bad*. It's just unnecessary.

I would add: Bloat is bad.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls