Re: [TLS] Implementation survey: Client Certificate URL extension
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TLS] Implementation survey: Client Certificate URL extension




Certicom's Security Builder SSL-C toolkit supports the client_certificate_url extension. Use of the hash is optional but recommended.
The toolkit is a C language SDK for creating client or server applications,with support for SSLv2, SSLv3, TLS v1.0, TLS v1.1, DTLS v1.0.

-----------------------------------------------
Robert Dugal
Member of Development Group
Certicom Corp.
EMAIL: rdugal at certicom.com
PHONE: (905) 501-3848
FAX  : (905) 507-4230
WEBSITE: www.certicom.com


tls-bounces at ietf.org wrote on 03/18/2008 07:39:49 AM:

> Hi,
>
> We currently have two open technical issues for 4366bis,
> both related to the Client Certificate URL extension (#45
> about making the hash mandatory; and #46 on how to do
> algorithm agility).
>
> The proposal in IETF71 was to make including the hash a MUST
> (regardless of TLS version number), and handle algorithm agility
> with a new extension number later (if it turns out something
> actually needs to be done).
>
> However, making the hash mandatory has some potential for interop
> problems (if there are old implementations which don't send it).
>
> If you have implemented, or have heard of someone implementing,
> the client_certificate_url extension, please send email.  
> Additional details (is this a client, server, or both; do you
> send the hash, etc.) are welcome but not required.
>
> Best regards,
> Pasi
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.