[TLS] Review of draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-01.txt

To: tls at ietf.org
Subject: [TLS] Review of draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-01.txt
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:22:13 -0700
Delivered-to: ietfarch-tls-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: tls at core3.amsl.com
List-help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: tls-bounces at ietf.org

Greetings again. During the f2f meeting in Philadelphia this week, I 
agreed to review draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-00.txt advance of the WG 
last call. I have now read it more carefully and don't find any 
significant issues. It seems like very straight-forward swapping of 
ECDHE for DHE at the appropriate places. I agree with the document's 
author that this should be Informational, similar to RFC 4492.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Prev by Date: Re: [TLS] Implementation survey: Client Certificate URL extension
Next by Date: [TLS] DTLS 1.2: Call for spec ambiguities
Previous by thread: [TLS] Implementation survey: Client Certificate URL extension
Next by thread: [TLS] DTLS 1.2: Call for spec ambiguities
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[TLS] Review of draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-01.txt

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.