[TLS] Fwd: draft-badra-tls-password-ext and challenge/response schemes
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[TLS] Fwd: draft-badra-tls-password-ext and challenge/response schemes



I originally sent this to the I-D author but have not recieved a response in
the interim.  Reflecting further, I thought that perhaps the list would know
the answer, thus this email. :)
Thanks,
--nwf;

----- Forwarded message from Nathaniel W Filardo <nwf at masters13.cs.jhu.edu> -----

Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 06:12:41 -0400
From: Nathaniel W Filardo <nwf at masters13.cs.jhu.edu>
To: badra at isima.fr
Subject: draft-badra-tls-password-ext and challenge/response schemes
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

Salutations.

I was thinking about how to secure TLS with S/Key and wasn't able to find an
immediate solution (though if you know of one, it could render my question
moot).  I happened across your Internet Draft and, after reading through it,
I wondered if changing

>   Servers that receive an extended hello containing a "password" 
>   extension MAY agree to authenticate the client using passwords by 
>   including an extension of type "password", with empty 
>   "extension_data", in the extended server hello.

to allow servers to specify some kind of textual data in the
"extension_data" field would be sufficient?  The server could then provide,
e.g., the S/Key challenge to the client this way.

Is this a silly thought?
Thanks much for your time.
--nwf;



----- End forwarded message -----

Attachment: pgpmA7dIVj3b3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.