Re: [TLS] Verifying X.509 Certificate Chains out of order
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TLS] Verifying X.509 Certificate Chains out of order
Martin Rex <Martin.Rex at sap.com> writes:
>Would a zero-length ASN.1 SEQUENCE not require that DistinguishedName have a
>zero length?
A zero-length BER encoding of a SEQUENCE would be 30 81 00, which meets the
minimum-length requirements of 3 bytes.
(I'd always assumed that the limit of 3 bytes was specifically to allow this
encoding of an empty DN, since it's not possible to get a DN that fits into 3
bytes).
Peter.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.